Infrastructures of Hope: A Theoretical Model for Precarity, Radical Empathy, and Collective Hope in Post-Disaster Urbanism

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2025

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Kare Publ

Open Access Color

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

This article proposes a four-layer theoretical model-Infrastructures of Hope (IH)-that centers the flow Precarity-Radical Empathy-Collective Hope in post-disaster urbanism, moving beyond a purely engineering view of resilience. No empirical findings are reported. The contribution is threefold: (i) theoretical- articulating IH and introducing the directed chain precarity-radical empathy-collective hope to planning scholarship; (ii) methodological-offering a context-adaptable testability/reporting template (CFA-SEM flow, Panels A/B) and principles for adapting validated scales without new scale development; (iii) application/ policy-framing Collective Action Intention (CAI) as a candidate outcome/monitoring indicator. The model draws on Butler for precarity, Bloch for hope, and Nussbaum with Caswell & Cifor for radical empathy. Through contextual adaptation of validated instruments, IH enables testing of H1-H6 paths (hope, empathy, perceived precarity, CAI). The template recommends CFA for measurement and SEM for structural relations; mediation (H6) is expected along the Empathy-CAI route. A mixed-methods sequence combines qualitative exploration (ethnographic/participatory workshops, discourse/narrative analysis, observation) with quantitative testing (adapted surveys), operationalising indicators such as framing, representational equity, and vision/scenario cycles in the discursive and temporal layers. In practice, IH recommends: (i) aligning proximity/access, permeability, and flexibility with affective safety and belonging; (ii) institutionalising par-ticipation and co-governance; and (iii) sustaining inclusive framing through vision and scenario cycles. No new scale development is claimed; measurements are adapted via back-translation, expert review, and piloting. IH frames post-disaster spatial production as an ethical and affective social transformation and offers an operationally testable theoretical architecture.

Description

Keywords

Post-Disaster Planning, Spatial Justice, Radical Empathy, Precarity, Hope

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Q4

Scopus Q

N/A

Source

Planlama-Planning

Volume

35

Issue

3

Start Page

446

End Page

466
Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™

Sustainable Development Goals